9th Chapter of Romans

 

Romans 9:1 (all verses are from the New International Version)

I speak the truth in Christ--I am not lying, my conscience confirms it in the Holy Spirit—

 

A PARENTHESIS CONCERNING ISRAEL

 

The apostle could not deal with the issue of men and women, whether Jew or Gentile, being given a right standing before God without addressing the place of Israel in God’s plan. Paul stated with great emotion his concern for the Jews, his own people. They had a special place in God’s purposes in the past. They were the recipients of adoption, glory, covenants, the law, the promises, temple worship, and the patriarchs. -- Holman Bible Handbook

 

·        The end of chapter 8 marks the conclusion of the first major section of this epistle.

·        Paul resumes his major themes in 12:1.

·        It seems that Paul has reached the very apex of the Christian in his relationship to Jesus Christ.

·        He has discussed the doctrines of justification, sanctification, and glorification.

·        There is another problem which troubles the apostle—the so-called “Jewish question.”

·        For the next three chapters we will deal with the question of Israel's standing before God

 

Paul has preached a gospel of righteousness by faith instead of righteousness by law. His gospel has made possible the salvation of the Gentiles without their becoming Jews. In so doing, the gospel has nullified the covenant rites of the Jewish race and has passed them by as the channels of revelation. What then is the future of the Jews? Does this mean that the Jews have been rejected entirely? Not at all! Although an apostle to the Gentiles, he himself was a Jew. Therefore, this Jewish problem presented very serious questions for him. What could be done about the Jewish problem? Does it mean that all Jews are lost forever? If they are to be saved, how will they be saved?

 

In chapters 9 through 11 Paul attempts to resolve this problem of the Jewish question by dealing with three areas:

(1) The absolute sovereignty of God (9:1-29);

(2) the freedom of man (9:30-10:21); and

(3) the harmonizing of the two (11:1-36).

 

Paul knew that he was regarded as a traitor to the dearest interest of his people (Act_21:27-28; Act_22:22; Act_25:24); therefore, the apostle opens his discussion of the subject by giving vent to his real feelings with extraordinary vehemence of protestation. -- New Commentary on the Whole Bible

 

PAUL BEARS HIS CONSCIENCE

 

Paul will disclose how he feels about his countrymen's lack of faith and dependence on God's promise. He makes an emotional appeal to his Jewish brothers with the Holy Spirit as his witness. Paul has already tried to appeal to them from a religious, logical and cultural perspective; and now he will make an emotional appeal before going again into a cultural (historical) one towards the middle and end of the chapter. We will see some elements of chapter 4 repeated in this chapter, dealing with the promise God made to Abraham.

 

The fact that Paul could prove he was telling the truth by the miracles he did was a great testimony to the Jews he was telling the truth:

 

2Co_12:12  NIV The things that mark an apostle—signs, wonders and miracles—were done among you with great perseverance.

 

1Th_1:5  NIV because our gospel came to you not simply with words, but also with power, with the Holy Spirit and with deep conviction. You know how we lived among you for your sake.

 

Romans 9:2

I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart.

 

Whenever Paul thinks of his lost countrymen it brings him great sorrow. He feels sorrow since they have rejected God and therefore damned their souls to everlasting perdition! How great his sorrow for them in view of the mercies of God! This is how we should feel for those whom we know are lost, especially if they are family members or people we know. Paul felt this way for his entire race and culture, knowing they were placing their hope on something hopeless and dooming themselves for all eternity!

 

This proves Paul was not a premillennialist.

 

(The following is taken from the Free Online Dictionary)

 

Modern premillennialism is divided into two schools of thought.

 

1.Dispensational Premillennialism - C.I. Scofield popularized dispensational premillennialism through the Scofield Reference Bible. Dispensational premillennialism generally holds that Israel and the Church are separate. It also widely holds to the pre-tribulational return of Christ, which believes that Jesus will return before a seven year Tribulation followed by an additional return of Christ with his saints (though there are post tribulation dispensationalists, such as Robert Gundry). Dispensationalism traces its roots to the 1830s and John Nelson Darby (1800-1882), a Calvinist theologian and a founder of the Plymouth Brethren. In the US this form of premillennial doctrine was propagated on the popular level largely through the Scofield Reference Bible and on the academic level with Lewis Sperry Chafer’s eight volume Systematic Theology. More recently dispensationalism has been propagated into the culture through Hal Lindsey's 1970s bestseller, The Late, Great Planet Earth and through the Left Behind Series by Tim Lahaye and Jerry Jenkins. Popular proponents of dispensational premillennialism are Dwight Pentecost, John Walvoord (d. 2002), Tim Lahaye, Charles Ryrie (in the notes for the Ryrie Study Bible) and Charles Feinberg. It should be noted that Craig Blaising and Darrell Bock have developed a form of dispensationalism that is in popularity known as progressive dispensationalism. This view understands that an aspect of the kingdom presently exists, but must wait for the millennium to be realized fully.

2.Historic Premillennialism - Historic or Classic Premillennialism is distinctively non-dispensational. This means that it sees no theological distinction between Israel and the church. It is often post tribulational meaning that the rapture of the church will occur after a period of tribulation. Historic premillennialism maintains chiliasm because of its view that the church will be caught up to meet Christ in the air and then escort him to the earth in order to share in his literal thousand year rule. Proponents of the view include George Eldon Ladd, and the 19th Century Lutheran theologian, G.N.H. Peters.

 

These schools of thought continue in the same error the Jews of Paul's day proposed: that there would be a literal political reign of the Messiah on earth for a thousand years, or some other temporal time before the end of the earth as we know of it would come.  Even to this day this false belief continues to affect even our foreign policy with Israel and Arab nations. Many believe that Israel is still God's people even though they do not even hold onto the Law of God as Jews from Paul's day did. Premillennialists of today believe that Israel will play a part in the coming of Jesus and His temporal reign of 1000 years on earth. They believe He will literally reign in the Holy City of Jerusalem.

 

This chapter proves them wrong and that Paul himself held no such belief. Paul has been stating that the Jewish system was the one that was temporal and it held no promise for things to come - the reality is Christ Himself and all those who are found in Him!

 

Romans 9:3

For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race,

 

Paul is greatly concerned for his Jewish brothers

 

Key phrase in this verse that will help us understand Paul's motive and distress: "I could wish...".  Paul does not even dare to wish it - he says I could wish... for he knows it was not even possible or permissible for him to want to be cut off for the sake of his Jewish brothers. Of course, maybe some of you have had this wish yourselves. I know I have; many times.

 

I have often thought of how it could be that I substitute myself for the salvation of my family if there was some possible way...  Of course, I would never want to give up my relationship with Jesus, for it is for that very reason I cannot even think or wish this; but my concern and love for them dares to wish it. This is why Paul says I could wish... that means he dared not wish it for real for that would mean to give up his union to Christ.

 

In a way this is exactly what Jesus (God) did for us. God did wish for Himself to be accursed for our sake and made it happen! Wow!

 

Phi_2:5-8 NIV Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, 7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death—even death on a cross!

 

So for us to have these daring thoughts is not far from our created image. I know I have wished for even my children to die innocent than be found dead apart from Christ in their age of accountability. It is a horrible thought either way, but far better for them to be in Christ forever than to be alive on this earth apart from Jesus. It certainly distresses me when I think about these things and I can only imagine the distress Paul felt for his countrymen. This is certainly an emotional appeal - straight to the heart of the matter. We ought to disclose such thoughts and be made vulnerable in the eyes of those whom we care about, that perhaps they may be moved by our extreme love for them. This is what Paul attempts; he leaves no stone unturned in the pursuit of the salvation of his comrades.

 

Understand this is in spite of the many troubles Paul suffered on account of his beloved brothers! All the persecutions and attempts made on his life did not dissuade him from loving them deeply and seeking their salvation! That is true love!

 

We can see the same attitude in Moses:

 

Exo_32:30-35 NIV The next day Moses said to the people, "You have committed a great sin. But now I will go up to the LORD; perhaps I can make atonement for your sin." 31 So Moses went back to the LORD and said, "Oh, what a great sin these people have committed! They have made themselves gods of gold. 32 But now, please forgive their sin—but if not, then blot me out of the book you have written." 33 The LORD replied to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against me I will blot out of my book. 34 Now go, lead the people to the place I spoke of, and my angel will go before you. However, when the time comes for me to punish, I will punish them for their sin." 35 And the LORD struck the people with a plague because of what they did with the calf Aaron had made.

 

What great humility! Just like Jesus, he did not consider himself above the people he cared for but willingly and devotedly interceded on their behalf.

 

Of course, Paul and Moses understood that even if it were possible for them to be given up for the sake of their people, the word of God would still be true and every man a liar (Rom_3:4). One human life, or even the whole human race cannot atone for even a single sin. That is why we need our Savior Jesus!

 

Romans 9:4

the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises.

 

Paul lists the justifications he felt for wanting to intercede for Israel. These are the things that made him so distressed. Since he identifies as an Israelite himself, these things struck a deep cultural chord in his heart as well. The first and foremost justification: They are Israelites: The name means "prince of God," or "one who contends with God," the same being the name given to Jacob by an angel of heaven at Peniel. From Jacob came the twelve sons of Israel (Jacob), hence the twelve tribes of Israel.

 

To them belong:

 

1.      Adoption - Paul will explain the nature of this adoption in the next few verses and also in chapter 11. Just remember it was originally intended for the Jew first, then for the gentile (Rom_1:16; Rom_2:10). The promise of this adoption was made originally to Abraham, the father of faith, a patriarch of Israel. God made Himself out to be Israel's Father and Husband, looking out and caring for them specifically (Exo_4:22).

2.      Glory - Since Israel was chosen by God to be exalted because of their obedience they had a glory no other peoples on earth had. The Jews have always prided themselves in this. The visible token of the glory of God itself rested on the ark of the covenant within the tabernacle, and later within the temple, filling them with His divine presence and peace. The ultimate redemption of their bodies was a glory God always wished for them and made a reality in the Messiah, Jesus Christ.

3.      Covenants - The covenants were made with the Israelites: their descendants and patriarchs. The pre-covenants with Noah and Abraham - the first covenant (The Giving of the Law) with the nation of Israel and the New Covenant was first disclosed to the Jews (Rom_3:1-2).

4.      Giving of the Law - The Law intended for the nation of Israel, to bind them with the Lord their God and to be made an example to all nations.

5.      (Temple)Worship (Service of God) - The right to worship God in Spirit and in truth was something given first to the Jews (Joh_4:22-24). This primarily refers to the temple service; regarded by them as the pride and ornament of their nation. "The entire system of worship and service pertaining to the temple and the God-ordained sacrifices and rituals. The promises (next item) primarily refer to the great Abrahamic promises, successively unfolded, and which had their fulfillment only in Christ. (See Act_26:6-7; Gal_3:16-17; Heb_7:6.)" – New Commentary on the Whole Bible

6.      Promise - The ultimate promise of fellowship with God forever was something God initiated with Israel and their descendants and patriarchs. They found fulfillment when the  Holy Spirit was first poured out amongst the Jews after the Christ suffered and was raised (Act_2:33; Gal_3:14; Eph_1:13).

7.      Patriarchs - All those famous and venerable patriarchs we know in the Old Testament account were the precursors of the Jews: Noah, Job, Abraham, Joseph, etc. These did not know of the Law but loved God and desired to be bound to Him.

8.      From their race is the Christ - Jesus Himself, the Messiah, from the flesh came from Israel and is a descendant of the sons of Israel, particularly the house of David, the tribe of Benjamin. What an honor and what prestige to be identified as the race God chose to be born in! This was a particularly emotive chord for Paul, who himself was a descendant of the tribe of Benjamin (Rom_11:1; Phi_3:5).

 

We can consider these 9 blessings unique to the Israelites.

 

It is true that the old economy was a state of tutelage and bondage (Gal_4:1-3); yet, compared with the state of the surrounding heathen, Abraham and his seed were very special and privileged as members of God’s family. God had adopted them as his own and fathered them (Exo_4:22; Deu_32:6; Isa_1:2; Jer_31:9; Hos_11:1; Mal_1:6). -- New Commentary on the Whole Bible

 

By opening up the discussion with the reminder of the blessings possessed by all true Israelites Paul tries to soften the blow he will deliver towards the end of this chapter - that Israel has stumbled and thus God has rejected them because they have rejected Jesus, the promised deliverer (Messiah)!

 

Romans 9:5

Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen.

 

An interesting side note from Coffman concerning the prestige of the patriarchs of the Israelites:

 

No people ever had more distinguished ancestors than the Jewish patriarchs. Such men as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were so noble, and so excessively beyond other men in character and integrity, that God himself deigned to identify himself as "the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob" (Exo_4:5). Abraham, especially, stands upon the horizon of pre-Christian history like a great monolith casting its shadow over centuries and millenniums of history. Three great religions, like streams coursing down from some mighty mountain and finding their issuance in various oceans, descend from Abraham; Muslims, Jews and Christians all alike hailing Abraham as their father. Paul truly appreciated the heritage that was his and Israel's in such distinguished progenitors of their magnificent race. -- Coffman

 

Christ Himself, here touted by Paul as God over all, as well as in these other verses (Phi_2:8; Col_2:9; Tit_2:13), was chosen to be born into such a race of people. The honor is too much for Paul not to use these facts as persuasive speech in his a fortiori arguments.

 

Needless to say, this is yet another verse where the deity of Christ is affirmed. Notice how Paul includes the "Amen" (Let it be so) to emphasize this necessary doctrine of faith (Joh_8:24). Without believing this is so we are lost and hopeless; the truth of Christ being God incarnate and interceding on our behalf that we may live with Him forever is the Gospel Paul preached everywhere (1Co_4:17).

 

Romans 9:6

It is not as though God's word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.

 

God is faithful - He has not failed

 

Paul wants it clearly known that it is not God's fault that the Israelites failed to recognize the Messiah in Jesus Christ. It was not God's words and prophecies that failed. What happens is that not all who profess to be Israelites belong to Israel, just as not everyone who professes to be a Christian belongs to Jesus (Mat_7:21; Luk_6:46).

 

Paul is trying to say their claim of descendance does not derive from the mere fact of being born an Israelite, any more than a person who is born in this country can claim is truly an American. Being an Israelite was a question of duty and honor to the God of the Israelites; it was a question of faith more than law, which is what the Jews held onto. The Jews made everything about law, which is why their genealogies were considered to be so important. Without a record of genealogy no one's descendance could be established as genuine, particularly for the Levites who were charged with the temple duties.

 

But now through Paul, the Spirit makes it clear that true faith is more than duty and honor to your ethnic origin or religious culture - it is obedience to the word of God by faith - particularly faith in God's Son, Jesus Christ. Paul had already mentioned this in chapter 2:

 

Rom_2:28-29 NIV A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. 29 No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a man's praise is not from men, but from God.

 

Romans 9:7

Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham's children. On the contrary, "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned."

 

Many peoples claim to be descendants of Abraham being that he did have hundreds of children (Gen_16:4-11; Gen_25:1-2); yet as we will see in Paul's logical progression of this argument, only Isaac was made the child of the promise. So Ishmael, though a descendant of Abraham, was not chosen by God as a child whose descendants would fulfill the promise God made to Abraham. Only those descending from Isaac would be named heirs of the promise. This was established by God's sovereignty, not by heredity or blood lineage.

 

Paul is slowly progressing to making the controversial point he wants to ultimately make: that Israel, because their rejection of Jesus, has been rejected by God.

 

In Galatians Paul used the analogy of the different covenants represented by Hagar and Sarah to explain that the descendants of Isaac were children of the promise to be fulfilled under the New Covenant:

 

Gal_4:22-31 NIV For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. 23 His son by the slave woman was born in the ordinary way; but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a promise.  24 These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar. 25 Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. 26 But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother. 27 For it is written:

   "Be glad, O barren woman,

      who bears no children;

   break forth and cry aloud,

      you who have no labor pains;

   because more are the children of the desolate woman

      than of her who has a husband."

 28 Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise. 29 At that time the son born in the ordinary way persecuted the son born by the power of the Spirit. It is the same now. 30 But what does the Scripture say? "Get rid of the slave woman and her son, for the slave woman's son will never share in the inheritance with the free woman's son." 31 Therefore, brothers, we are not children of the slave woman, but of the free woman.

 

Paul makes another attempt to soften the hard blow he is working to deliver using this analogy.

 

Romans 9:8

In other words, it is not the natural children who are God's children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham's offspring.

 

THE TRUE CHILDREN OF GOD

 

Now the premise of the true identity and descendance of God's children is affirmed, one that he began to established back in Rom_2:28-29. It is not a fleshly descendance or inheritance we are looking for, says Paul, but a spiritual one - one that came by a promise!

 

Joh_1:12-13 NIV Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— 13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.

 

This right came to all the families of the earth through the promise made to Abraham:

 

Gen_12:3 NIV I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.

 

Gal_4:28 NIV Now you, brothers, like Isaac, are children of promise.

 

God is spirit (Joh_4:24), therefore His true children will be spiritual, born of the water and the Spirit (Joh_3:5), worshipping in Spirit and in truth! God never intended for His promise to be fulfilled according to worldly or carnal ways, since God is Spirit! The Jews were proud of their physical inheritance, but that was a limited enterprise. God's promise was to be fulfilled through the Spirit and in the Spirit - in Jesus Christ!

 

Gal_3:29 NIV If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

 

The material and fleshly inheritance of the Jews has already faded, never to return, but the inheritance we will receive in Jesus far exceeds anything in the world and will never perish, spoil or fade (1Pe_1:4)!

 

Php_3:3 NIV For it is we who are the circumcision, we who worship by the Spirit of God, who glory in Christ Jesus, and who put no confidence in the flesh

 

Even the birth of Isaac himself was by spiritual intervention, since both Sarah and Abraham were very old and Sarah was never able to get pregnant. And even though Ishmael was a fleshly son of Abraham, God's decision was to promise blessings to those who would come through Isaac - that is us, the Christians of today born out of obedience to the word of God.

 

So, is physical Israel considered God's children, as so many in the denominational word believe? Absolutely not! The children of God are those who are in Christ!

 

Gal_3:27-29 NIV ...for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

 

Romans 9:9

For this was how the promise was stated: "At the appointed time I will return, and Sarah will have a son."

 

Paul quotes from Gen_18:10. Isaac here is the antitype of Jesus. Just as God chose Isaac to fulfill the promise made to Abraham, God chose His Son Jesus to make true on that promise. Isaac, like Jesus, was a birth not from human decision or will, but by the Spirit of God.

 

Romans 9:10

Not only that, but Rebekah's children had one and the same father, our father Isaac.

 

Another example of divine will and selection is the favoring of Jacob over Esau.

 

Paul's point is that if God chooses whom He chooses, who are we to limit or ascribe blessings, when it is God, in His great mercy, who desires to choose those who are obedient to Him? We will see this thought develop in the next few verses.

 

As sovereign Lord, Creator of all things, He has the perfect right to plan and work in His world according to His own purposes. His purpose could be one of total destruction. Instead, He chose in love to work out a way to save those who believe. -- Disciple's Study Bible

 

Romans 9:11

Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad--in order that God's purpose in election might stand:

 

Notice the reference to when they were in utero, fetuses, described as people and already identified and chosen by God. Where does this fit in with the abortionist's idea that people are not human beings before they are born, or that they are without identity or purpose?

 

Some Calvinists will say that God chooses people before they are born to be condemned or to be saved. People have no choice about what their life will be - God has already predestined them for something despite their individual volition. But where does this leave passages like Joh_3:16 or 2Pe_3:9 (and many others), which tell us God wants all people to be saved and that choice is ours?

 

Notice the reasoning given by the Spirit to explain this predetermination:

 

So that God's purpose of election might continue: that it may not be determined by the work of man but by God, in keeping with the promise He made Abraham and in keeping with His sovereign will, not man's will.

 

1.      There's a difference between, predetermining a man's life (individual election - what is also known as the Calvinist's predestination) and predetermining a fulfilled promise or vehicle of fulfillment (salvation) for individuals. Since God knew how these two, Esau and Jacob, would live; He knew which one would be best suited for the purpose of His promise. God did not pick them based on their birth order not works, but because He wanted to fulfill a promise to all obedient peoples on earth.

2.      There's also a difference between God imposing on man's will (predestination) and God knowing the future (foreknowledge). See Rom_8:29-30 notes on this. God did not work against someone's will: He knows the end result.

 

The Holy Spirit wants the Jews to understand that man has never dictated nor is able to change God's plan and promise. The Jews cannot decide who is saved and who is not: that is God's sovereign choice as judge and Creator. God has always been in the details, planning and willing amongst men (Act_17:26-28). This doesn't mean God decides who is saved or who is lost, He just simply knows the end result since He is outside of time.

 

It should be remembered that Paul's entire argument here is to the effect that other factors besides fleshly descent had always been involved in determining the seed of Abraham. God's election was a factor in it; but that factor entered into the determination as a consequence of other factors. Esau was rejected because of what God knew he would become and of what Esau's character would produce in the lives of his posterity. -- Coffman

 

Romans 9:12

not by works but by him who calls--she was told, "The older will serve the younger."

 

Reference to Gen_25:23. Based on God's foreknowledge. We can understand from what God told Rebekah that these words were in reference to two nations that were going to come out of her sons. So these predictions were not about individuals per se, but about the nations that would come out from them.

 

Romans 9:13

Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."

 

Reference to Mal_1:2-3. This was said by God long after Jacob and Esau lived, in reference to the nations that came from them. The Edomites, descendants of Esau, were a nation that did not honor God. The word translated as hate is the same word Jesus uses in Luk_14:26 : miseo (Gk). It simply means "to love less" by comparison.

 

God’s favor and blessing upon Jacob was so extensive that by comparison Esau would appear to be hated. The verse could be understood to mean that God has chosen Jacob to fulfill His elective purpose, but He has rejected Esau. -- Believer's Study Bible

 

Romans 9:14

What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!

 

Even if God did predestine people and imposed on their wills would that constitute injustice? This is what some thought God was doing; and even the Calvinists say God is doing that very thing. But the Holy Spirit will teach us something in these next few verses about the justice, or should I say, mercy, of God's will. Recall since Rom_1:17 that Paul has always made it a point to illustrate the righteousness of God in all He does, especially in dealing with man's problem and resolution.

 

The question in the Jew's mind that Paul is trying to pre-empt is: If God intervened so much in our lives, judging us even before we are born, is it really righteousness? Again, this question presumes God is imposing and predetermining on the individual's will.

 

The answer, of course, is "by no means!" If anything this shows the righteousness of God in the amount of mercy He is willing to extend unto those who are disobedient - putting into effect a plan that is very hard not to notice: the Gospel of Jesus Christ!

 

Romans 9:15

For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."

 

GOD'S MERCY IS SOVEREIGN

 

Paul quotes from Exo_33:19. This indicates the sovereign will of God on all peoples. The emphasis here being on mercy and compassion! God saves whomever He decides to save!

 

(God's statement to Moses is given) not as a proof of stern and inexorable justice, but as “the very proof of his benevolence,” and the highest which he thought proper to exhibit. When people, therefore, under the influence of an unrenewed and hostile heart, charge this as an unjust and arbitrary proceeding, they are resisting and perverting what God regards as the very demonstration of his benevolence. The sense of the passage clearly is, that he would choose the objects of his favor, and bestow his mercies as he chose. None of the human race deserved his favor; and he had a right to pardon whom he pleased, and to save people on his own terms, and according to his sovereign will and pleasure. -- Albert Barnes

 

The whole theme for the next few chapters is the sovereign mercy and compassion of God on all peoples, especially to the Jews and then to the Gentile. Paul will not only be addressing the Jews on this, but in Chapter 11 especially the Gentile Christians of Rome are also part of his audience.

 

God's declaration of mercy and compassion testifies:

·        That He is sovereign, without giving an account of the reason of His choice to any.

·        That He is merciful without regard to any claim on the part of man; man being destitute of merit, and having no right to His mercy.

·        That He will be compassionate to any extent which He pleases, and in whatever time and manner may best accord with His own good pleasure.

·        That He has regard for a definite peoples and that on those he intends to bestow eternal life.

·        That no one has a right to complain.

 

This does not mean that God blindly blessed and curses without any sense of reasoning or arbitrarily:

 

This quotation from Exodus simply does not speak of a totally blind man separating a box of black and white marbles in a cellar at midnight without any light! -- Coffman

 

Some prominent theologians assert that it does. They go on to say God that there is no human justification or reason that can be attributed to God's election and predetermination of man. Such egregious claims cannot be justified from Scripture. Quite to the contrary, God, who does not need to explain Himself to us, always gives us His reasoning - treating us as children who are loved and who need to be taught their Father's will; which is very predictable, just and perfectly rational to those who choose to deny themselves and love Him with all their heart, soul, mind and strength.

 

Notice God's explanation for electing Abraham:

 

Gen_18:19 NIV For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, so that the LORD will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him.

 

Just as we have argued that God rejected Ishmael and Esau because of His foreknowledge, God elected Abraham and his descendants because He knew he could rely on their dependence and faithfulness of Him.

 

This is why we have no right to complain about God's election or doings amongst men. He is blameless and continually chooses to bless a rebellious people. If anything, we as inadequate and sinful people have earned only two rights:

 

The right to disobey and the right to die (be condemned), which really are one right in light of the free will God has extended man.

 

Rom_6:23 NIV For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

 

Another right bestowed to man in this recent age is this:

 

Joh_1:12 ESV But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God...

 

Rev_3:21 NIV To him who overcomes, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I overcame and sat down with my Father on his throne.

 

This right is granted by Jesus Christ to all who receive Him and who believe in His name.

 

Romans 9:16

It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy.

 

Here is the theme of the rest of this chapter and through the next two: God is sovereign! This means man is not to dictate how and when one is saved: God has decided that and answers to no one.

 

The Jews had thought God owed them salvation because of the long history and association they had with Him. They regarded themselves as holy and were full of self-righteousness, as we see from their dealings with Jesus Himself.

 

1.      The Jews were willing and running for the position that God would bless and save people only through them, but God was not granting that role to one just because they were willing to run for that role.

2.      God, and God only, would choose the means and ways of salvation.

3.      Once God made His choice, then it made no difference who did or did not like it.

4.      This is true with the plan of salvation.

5.      God did not ask any of us what the plan needed to be.

-- World Video Bible School

 

Many men may think their election depends on merit: their efforts. Some think it is about having God's favor despite our faithfulness. What Paul is specifying here by the Holy Spirit is that the human will and effort does not factor in God's election when it comes to salvation. We cannot will ourselves saved nor work to gain salvation as many think. It is because of our will that we need the mercy of God (Rom_3:23)! And no matter how good your intentions may be you cannot will anyone else to be saved either, no matter how much you may plead on their behalf or work on their behalf. If they have chosen to ignore God's plan, that is their choice!

 

God has set a specific plan according to His mercy and that plan is what has been elected as the vehicle of salvation by obedience of God's word, which is by faith in Him. Anyone else who places their faith in man's ideas or words, apart from the Gospel, is doomed by their own will apart from obedience.

 

A.     Catholics rely on a mixture of merit-based salvation and a view that God plays favorites or saves based on pity:

1.      Apart from their sacraments you cannot be saved

2.      It's about how many good deeds you do regardless of the bad ones

3.      They rely on "saints", candles and "virgins"

4.      They rely on prayers, crucifixes and rosaries apart from the Bible.

B.     Protestants (basically non-Catholics) rely on grace without works. They've completely taken themselves out of the equation all together and some extremists (Calvinists usually) will say that no matter what you do God has already declared who is saved and who is not.

1.      You cannot loose or gain your salvation

2.      You can be saved without need of repentance - you are saved by grace (faith only)

3.      You don't need to be obedient to be saved - all you need to do is believe (forget about the biblical synecdoche of belief!)

4.      Salvation is subjective and exclusionary (supports the false and dangerous ideology of multiculturalism which fragments society even more).

5.      Basically Protestantism is a reaction to merit based catholic doctrine

C.     Mormons, JW's, 7th Day Adventist and other cultish religions rely on their own interpretation of God's word to form exclusionary groups. This is contrary to the inclusionary nature of the Gospel of Jesus. Jesus' goal is to form one body out of the many. These cults want to exclude the many to form their own clicks. Strict adherence to their own extra biblical views is mandated or you are outside the group. They are to conform to whoever is the main leader of the movement, as opposed to conforming to Jesus Christ.

 

I exclude modern day ecumenism since it basically assumes many of the "non-threatening" and exclusionary ideologies of Protestantism. Our society is moving towards a more liberal and subjective view of the scriptures (which the scriptures don't support by any measure) in reaction to the former centuries of dogmatic and conservative thought.

 

God's mercy trumps all of these: The Gospel rules! Repent and obey God!

 

Just because God's plan does not depend on our will or effort deosn't mean our will and effort are needed for us to become saved once Gods has established His plan!

 

A.     The word “will” in this verse does not have reference to man’s response to God’s requirements of salvation.

1.      Rev_22:17 NIV The Spirit and the bride say, "Come!" And let him who hears say, "Come!" Whoever is thirsty, let him come; and whoever wishes, let him take the free gift of the water of life.

2.      Mat_23:37 NIV O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing.

B.     The word “effort or exertion” in this verse does not have reference to man’s response to God’s requirements of salvation.

1.      Not only must we run, we must finish the course!

2.      1Co_9:24 NIV Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one gets the prize? Run in such a way as to get the prize.

3.      Heb_12:1 NIV Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us.

      -- World Video Bible School

 

Our will and effort is required for obedience that leads to salvation!

 

Php_2:12-13 NIV Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you to will and to act according to his good purpose.

 

Our will and effort did not bring about God's plan for salvation but are required to be saved and to conform unto Jesus!

 

Romans 9:17

For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."

 

By God's foreknowledge He chose Pharaoh to show the power of His name (Exo_9:16).

 

Much debate has been generated by the lack of understanding of the difference between God's foreknowledge and God's election of peoples.

 

Remember:

 

1.      There's a difference between, predetermining a man's life (individual election - what is also known as the Calvinist's predestination) and predetermining a fulfilled promise or vehicle of fulfillment (salvation) for individuals. Since God knew how these two, Esau and Jacob, would live; He knew which one would be best suited for the purpose of His promise. God did not pick them based on their birth order not works, but because He wanted to fulfill a promise to all obedient peoples on earth.

2.      There's also a difference between God imposing on man's will (predestination) and God knowing the future (foreknowledge). See Rom_8:29-30 notes on this. God did not work against someone's will: He knows the end result.

 

Many have decried God's actions against Pharaoh as unjust or unfair, or have misunderstood this verse to a point where they say God has already elected individuals regardless of their will, so there's nothing you can do to ensure your own salvation. But what does this verse below say?:

 

2Pe_1:10-11 NIV Therefore, my brothers, be all the more eager to make your calling and election sure. For if you do these things, you will never fall, 11 and you will receive a rich welcome into the eternal kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

 

How can you make your calling and election sure if it has already been predetermined? You can't! But if God has predetermined a way for you to get to Heaven then you can make sure you’re in that vehicle that will get you there: Jesus Christ!

 

So what principle is at work in the hardening of Pharaoh's heart? Did God harden it or did Pharaoh himself harden his own heart? Let's see:

 

Exo_4:21 NIV The LORD said to Moses, "When you return to Egypt, see that you perform before Pharaoh all the wonders I have given you the power to do. But I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go.

 

Here God says He will harden his heart. Does that mean Pharaoh had no choice? Let's let the Bible tell us before we second guess God:

 

Exo_8:15 NIV But when Pharaoh saw that there was relief, he hardened his heart and would not listen to Moses and Aaron, just as the LORD had said.

 

Here we see that it was Pharaoh himself who hardened his own heart! So why did God say He would do it in the previ